Three Tests of Trust.
Choose investors like co-founders. Choose co-founders on trust, tested three ways.
The Creator's Journey · Chapter VIII, Capital and the Exit
Taking a particular investor’s money is a one-way door. Once an investor is on your cap table, they are part of your company’s life, through every round and every crisis, until the end. That is why I say to choose them like co-founders.
Investors are easy to love when times are good. The real test comes when times are bad. The worst capital I ever took failed that test. It came from an angel investor, and the test came during COVID. He was not a large investor. But he consumed an enormous share of our time and attention when we had none to spare. The best investors I have had leaned in. They gave us confidence when confidence was scarce, gave us room to grow and did not get picky or greedy.
So how do you choose a co-founder? Not everyone handles stress the same way. Founders can be buddies when everything is great. When things go badly wrong, you do not want a partner who takes the highway and leaves. The number one thing I look for is trust, and I test it three ways.
- Truthful
- Is this person honest? That one is usually easy to determine.
- Reliable
- Will he do the job? Does he have the fortitude? Do I want him in the foxhole with me? When Ciaran Hynes says, “Don’t worry, I got it,” I can go to bed knowing that he has it.
- Capable
- Can this person do the job, and will they admit it if not? A gap you know about can be covered. A gap someone hides cannot.
Co-founding is tougher than marriage, and marriages end with divorce. When your company is in the middle of a storm, you need to know the partnership is right.
Trust is a function of two things: Character and competence.
Character and competence
Covey’s split maps cleanly onto the three tests. Truthful and reliable speak to character. Capable speaks to competence. A partner strong in one and weak in the other will fail you in a storm, just in different ways.
The structure matters too. As an investor, I often see co-founders split the company 50-50, because it is easy at the beginning. Is it really 50-50? Research by Thomas Hellmann and Noam Wasserman, covering 1,476 founders in 511 ventures, found that equal splits were associated with lower first-round valuations, most of all when teams settled the split in less than a day. Ask the question at the start, while it is still a conversation.
Run the tests
- Write how you would knowFor each test, truthful, reliable and capable, write the evidence that would convince you.
- Work one hard problem togetherBefore you commit, solve something real under pressure. Stress shows character faster than success does.
- Question the splitWrite what each of you really brings. Then ask whether your split is really 50-50.
- Hold investors to the same barDescribe the investor you want beside you in your worst quarter. Check your list against that paragraph.
Quick answers
How do you choose a co-founder?
Rob Frasca tests trust three ways: is the person truthful, reliable and capable? Capable includes admitting a gap, because a gap you know about can be covered and a gap someone hides cannot.
Should co-founders split equity 50-50?
Rob Frasca advises asking at the start whether the contributions are really equal. Research by Thomas Hellmann and Noam Wasserman links equal splits, especially quick ones, to lower first-round valuations.
Sources
- Rob Frasca, The Creator’s Journey (forthcoming), Chapter VIII, Capital and the Exit.
- Stephen M. R. Covey, The Speed of Trust: The One Thing That Changes Everything (Free Press, 2006). Quoted on FranklinCovey’s program page. Source
- Thomas Hellmann and Noam Wasserman, “The First Deal: The Division of Founder Equity in New Ventures,” NBER Working Paper 16922, 2011; Management Science, 2017. Source